<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head>

<!-----TITLES SECTIONS---------------------------><title>Unbreakable</title></head><body bgcolor="#ffffff" link="#007a00" alink="#007a00" vlink="#007a00"><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><center><font size="+1">&nbsp;




<b>Unbreakable</b> (2000)




&nbsp;</font></center></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><center>
  <img SRC="images/dividers/a.small.holly.gif" width="62" height="38" align="Baseline"><b>&nbsp;</b>
</center>



<!--BEGIN REVIEW TEXT HERE--------------------------->


<p>This is a film about archetypes. Much was made in the previews about
a man who is the only survivor of a train disaster, emerging without a scratch,
a man who never gets sick. One gets the impression that it's a film about
a phyla of immortals, or about some rare or odd occurrence, or simply about
people who can't get hurt. Even the web site is called <a href="http://www.areyouunbreakable.com">areyouunbreakable.com</a>. On the contrary, this is a film about mythology and its meaning.

</p><p>Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson) has grown up with osteo-genesis
imperfecta, a condition that leaves the bones extraordinarily brittle. Frequently,
when he leaves home, he is horribly injured. The slightest fall will incapacitate
him. It is the larger-than-life tales in comic books that, ironically, are
his connection with the world. His mother gives him one for each time he
takes up the courage to go outside. The kids call him "Mr. Glass.", because
his bones break like glass.  </p><p>As an adult, Mr. Glass is a comic art
dealer and proprietor of an exclusive studio. He is interested in archetypes
and the collective unconscious. Mr. Glass believes that comics are an unconscious
"exaggeration of the truth" and deconstructs them to find that truth. Indeed,
he is searching for it:  </p><blockquote> I've studied the form of comics
intimately... I believe comics are our last link to an ancient way of passing
on history. The anicent Egyptians drew on the walls; countries all over the
world still pass on knowledge through pictorial forms. I believe comics are
a form of history that someone somewhere felt or experienced. </blockquote>

<p>Where Mr. Glass breaks, David Dunn (Bruce Willis) is apparently unbreakable:
A security guard who has never broken a bone in his body. Someone who protects.
Someone who spends every day in sadness, because he feels there is something
he is supposed to be doing with his life, but isn't. Mr. Glass believes he
has found, in David Dunn, someone with a special purpose... "the kind of
person these stories are about... a person put here to protect the rest of
us... to guard us."  </p><p>So, too, this is a film about vocation -- about
the notion of a purpose to one's life -- a kind of work one is meant to do.
Mr. Glass is convinced that there are special people in the world, with unique
vocations, and particular abilities to perform them. He is questioning the
notion that life is merely ordinary, and wonders if it's possible for a person
to know why he or she is here.  </p><p>There is a thoughtful emotional subplot
in the film. It is the pain of a son (Spencer Treat Clark) who wants to be
like his father but discovers, in his father's unusual qualities, that he
is not like him and never can be. It is the exploration of the distance suddenly
felt between someone with unique abilities and those who don't share them.
The theme is so true to life. Perhaps it's an older brother who is a football
star, and the younger feels simply banal. Or all the Barbies in a world where
one's looks are plain. How lovely to have made the film, too, a story about
what it's like not to be a Prometheus but still to suffer.  </p><p>I would
have liked as sophisticated a handling of the role of David's wife (Robin
Wright Penn). There is the marriage-destroying distance between them -- the
difficulty of loving someone who carries with him a relentless sadness, who
cannot let himself be loved. We gather that she is trying to find love in
the marriage. Still, Megan deserved a voice of her own, and didn't really
get one. She was the most passive character. More thought should have gone
into making her with something more than just a collection of emotions. Another
piece of irony: in the opening scene, our hero is making a rather unheroic
attempt to cheat on his wife. Sure, it underlines that they have a troubled
marriage, but the film doesn't explore this with enough depth.  </p><p>The
outstanding performance of Charlayne Woodard, as Elijah's mother, demanded
more exploration of the relationship of mother and son. What we have is wonderful,
but there just isn't enough to give Elijah the required emotional depth his
character demands. Jackson, in the film's final scene, does in fact give
us a wealth of beautiful passion sensitively acted. It is this amazing actor
who rescues the character, and saves for Mr. Glass the substance he must
have to be who he is. Again, though, one wishes there was more. I loved this
character, especially in his last scene.  </p><p>In the portentous words
of a young Mr. Glass' mother, as she bribes him with a comic book, "They
say this one has a surprise ending..."  </p><p>Writer and director M. Night Shyamalan who, in the previous year, gave us <b>The Sixth Sense</b>
, has done a lovely job of creating the mood of a similarly enticing urban
fantasy. There is just enough of the otherworldly that one questions through
most of the film whether what's occuring is coincidence or the fantastic.
The decisions about wardrobe are also to be admired. In this particular story,
wardrobe is crucial, and here is a light and subtle hand at work. The camera,
too, feeds the viewer's senses in an awakening crescendo.  </p><p>There was
nothing particularly noteworthy about the music. The special effects were
pleasantly tame and have that dreamlike quality that they did in <b>The Sixth Sense</b>.

</p><p><b>Unbreakable</b> was perhaps hamstrung by its marketing campaign.
It's as though the trailers have a plot-direction altogether different from
the one in the film. That always seems like a bad idea, since then no one
gets what they expect. It seems, too, as though the film has been at least
occasionally misunderstood, perhaps precisely because of the confusion of
expectations. It could be looked upon as a gimmick-film, just as could <b>The Sixth Sense</b>
, especially with the sudden and illuminating conclusion, but that is to
miss the richness of its drama and poetic implications.   </p><p>One must
remember too, that the film is constructed much like its subject -- heroic
comic books. A careful glance will find distinct similarities in the form.
I would have liked more development of the final plot elements, but like
a small slice of chocolate cake, I wouldn't have missed this film for there
being less than I'd want.   <!-----INSERT REVIEWER NAME & LINK BELOW---->
</p>
<p align="Right">[<a href="bio/asher.black.htm"><b>Asher Black</b></a>] 
  <!--LINKS ECTION----------------------------------------------->
</p>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><center><font size="+1">
<!------BEGIN LINK TEXT HERE----------------------------->

The flash-animated <a href="http://video.go.com/unbreakable/html/intro.html">official website</a> is very cool, with interesting additional thematic material. This reviewer is using the wallpaper and screensaver right now.



<!----------------FOOTER BEGINS HERE--------------------->
</font></center></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><center>
  <img SRC="images/dividers/a.small.holly.gif" width="62" height="38" align="Baseline"> 
  <p><a href="film_index/videoreviews.html"><img SRC="images/navigation/duplicate_filenames1/grn_previous24.gif" width="388" height="76" border="0" align="Baseline"></a><b>&nbsp;</b></p>
  <p><img SRC="images/legal/Legal.jpg" width="458" height="85" align="Baseline"></p>
</center></body></html>

